• About Us
    • SIZA Integrated Stakeholder Strategy
  • Why SIZA
    • Subscription Levels & Costs
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Standards
    • Standards Review Process
    • Audit Process Methodology
  • Audit Process
    • Completing the SAQ
    • Choosing An Audit Firm
    • Audit Execution
    • Audit Frequency & Between Audit Monitoring
    • Audit Disputes Process
  • AgriTrack360
    • AgriTrack360 Resources
    • AgriTrack360 FAQs
    • Tracking Impact Data – M&E Reports
  • Training & Support
    • Upcoming Training
    • Resources
  • Grievances
    • Lodge a Grievance
  • SIZA Connect
    • Newsletters
    • Logo Usage
  • Contact
  • info@siza.co.za
  • Helpline: 086 111 1568
  • WhatsApp Line: 079 469 1753
  • MySIZA Platform
Siza Staging Site Siza Staging Site Siza Staging Site
  • About Us
    • SIZA Integrated Stakeholder Strategy
  • Why SIZA
    • Subscription Levels & Costs
    • Terms & Conditions
  • Standards
    • Standards Review Process
    • Audit Process Methodology
  • Audit Process
    • Completing the SAQ
    • Choosing An Audit Firm
    • Audit Execution
    • Audit Frequency & Between Audit Monitoring
    • Audit Disputes Process
  • AgriTrack360
    • AgriTrack360 Resources
    • AgriTrack360 FAQs
    • Tracking Impact Data – M&E Reports
  • Training & Support
    • Upcoming Training
    • Resources
  • Grievances
    • Lodge a Grievance
  • SIZA Connect
    • Newsletters
    • Logo Usage
  • Contact

Audit Disputes

  • Home
  • Auditing Newsletter
  • Audit Disputes

A total of 19 Social audit disputes were logged with SIZA from January to September 2020. All 19 disputes followed the formal SIZA Dispute Process whereby formal feedback from the audit company was provided, and subsequent feedback from the SIZA Audit Expert Group. To date, all 19 disputes have been resolved in full.

Overall, audit disputes consisted of:

  • The interpretation of the auditor on harassment and abuse.
  • Employees cooking in accommodation.
  • Calculation of rest periods during and after shift-work.
  • The incorrect payment of overtime (calculated on maximum time per week or month instead of daily contracted hours).
  • Incorrect information provided to the audit company prior to the audit, resulting in several findings pertaining to contracts and number of employees not available on site during the audit.
  • Dissatisfaction regarding risk ratings of findings (severity).
  • The interpretation on rest periods and meal breaks after 5 hours of work.
  • The democratic election of a worker representative committee due to historical strain.
Tags: Audit disputes, Audits, Dispute

Critical Alert Notifications
Previous Post

Critical Alert Notifications

Third-Party Audit Companies
Next Post

Third-Party Audit Companies

Related Posts

Auditing Newsletter May 3, 2022

Community Engagement: Looking after your neighbour

Auditing Newsletter May 3, 2022

SIZA and Rainforest Alliance combined audits — The principles that should be adhered to during the combined process

Auditing Newsletter May 3, 2022

Market requirements for flower producers

Company

  • About Us
  • Why SIZA
  • Grievances
  • Newsletters
Logo
Navigating sustainability and compliance within South Africa's dynamic agricultural sector.

Contact Information

10 Niblick Way,
Section 5, The Beachhead,
Somerset West 7130 | South Africa
+27(0) 21 852 8184
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Logo Usage
  • MySIZA Platform
Compare list 0